CDB15:0000813 IFNA1 — IFNAR1
Experimentally validated in Human; Orthology-inferred in Mouse, Rat, Zebrafish, Chicken, Macaque, Pig, Marmoset
Title
Journal:; Year Published:
Abstract
Differential receptor subunit affinities of type I interferons govern differential signal activation.
Journal of molecular biology, 2007; PubMed, Homo sapiens IFNA1 — Homo sapiens IFNAR1
ABSTRACT: Type I interferons (IFNs) elicit antiviral, antiproliferative and immunmodulatory responses by binding to a shared cell surface receptor comprising the transmembrane proteins ifnar1 and ifnar2. Activation of differential response patterns by IFNs has been observed, suggesting that members of the family play different roles in innate immunity. The molecular basis for differential signaling has not been identified yet. Here, we have investigated the recognition of various IFNs including several human IFNalpha species, human IFNomega and human IFNbeta as well as ovine IFNtau2 by the receptor subunits in detail. Binding to the extracellular domains of ifnar1 (ifnar1-EC) and ifnar2 (ifnar2-EC) was monitored in real time by reflectance interference and total internal reflection fluorescence spectroscopy. For all IFNs investigated, competitive 1:1 interaction not only with ifnar2-EC but also with ifnar1-EC was shown. Furthermore, ternary complex formation was studied with ifnar1-EC and ifnar2-EC tethered onto solid-supported membranes. These analyses confirmed that the signaling complexes recruited by IFNs have very similar architectures. However, differences in rate and affinity constants over several orders of magnitude were observed for both the interactions with ifnar1-EC and ifnar2-EC. These data were correlated with the potencies of ISGF3 activation, antiviral and anti-proliferative activity on 2fTGH cells. The ISGF3 formation and antiviral activity correlated very well with the binding affinity towards ifnar2. In contrast, the affinity towards ifnar1 played a key role for antiproliferative activity. A striking correlation was observed for relative binding affinities towards ifnar1 and ifnar2 with the differential antiproliferative potency. This correlation was confirmed by systematically engineering IFNalpha2 mutants with very high differential antiproliferative potency.
Domains of interaction between alpha interferon and its receptor components.
Journal of molecular biology, 1994; PubMed, Homo sapiens IFNA1 — Homo sapiens IFNAR1
ABSTRACT: We describe how constraints on the binding of human interferons (IFNs), alpha1 and alpha2 and alpha8 on mouse cells are partially relieved by the expression of the bovine (Bo) or human (Hu) IFN alpha/beta receptor (IFNAR) component in these cells. We show that, while the binding of all three is substantially increased by the transfection of Bo IFNAR, it is accompanied by an increase in activity only in the case of alpha2 and alpha8 (IFNs that otherwise have little activity on mouse cells). IFN alpha1, which shows some partial activity on mouse cells, responds to the presence of Bo IFNAR by acting, at low concentrations, as a competitive antagonist to IFNs alpha2 and alpha8. A review of published results on IFN hybrid scanning and on the effects of expressing Bo IFNAR in human cells led us to propose that an N-terminal segment of the IFN molecule interacts directly with IFNAR. Applying site-directed mutagenesis to an IFN hybrid; alpha8[60]alpha1[92]alpha8, we show that the point mutations K84 to E84 and Y90 to D90 act synergistically to cause the hybrid to behave as the parental IFN alpha8, switching the preference from Mu to Hu IFNAR in transfected mouse cells. The published structural models for IFN reveal that positions 84 and 90 span the exposed residues of the alpha-helix C of the IFN molecule. We derive a model of IFN-receptor interaction in which the A helix and the C helix of IFN interact with IFNAR and in which a binding phase can be distinguished from a binding/activity phase. We propose that the so-called "hot" domains of the IFN molecule (the AB loop and the D helix) are presented by IFNAR to interact with an additional component of the functional receptor.